A sentencing judge's use of strong, even powerful language to describe serious offending does not constitute a House v The King error where the assessment of objective seriousness is otherwise open on the evidence. An application for leave to appeal against sentence is not an occasion for the revision or reformulation of sentencing submissions not advanced below. A sentencing judge is not obliged to treat an offender's mental illness as moderating general deterrence where no such submission was made at sentence and the evidence does not establish the illness was active during the offending.
The full text is available to signed-in members.