The case illustrates how acquittals on some counts in a multi-count sexual offence trial can be rationally explained by timing issues, narrow date ranges in the indictment, and different elements required for different counts, without undermining the complainant's credibility for the purposes of the conviction counts. A complainant's error as to the date of an incident does not necessarily reflect on her credibility as to what occurred.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 20 later cases that cite this judgment.
8 of the 20 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.