Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

R v McCloskey; R v Hamalainen [2019] NSWSC 1175 — Evidence — Barrister AI

R v McCloskey; R v Hamalainen

[2019] NSWSC 1175

Supreme Court of NSW

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Evidence
1. previous out of court representations concerning past joint criminal enterprise not made in the presence of the party
1. whether such representations relevant
1. whether exceptions to the hearsay rule apply as representations are admissions or admissible for a non-hearsay purpose

Case Details

Citation[2019] NSWSC 1175

CourtNSWSC

JurisdictionNew South Wales

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.

Cited by1

2019Hamalainen v RNSWCCA 276

Relies on7

2016R v Qaumi & Ors (No 14) (Judge alone application)NSWSC 274
2008Regina (C'Wealth) v Baladjam & Ors [No 19]NSWSC 1441
2008HML v The Queen; SB v The Queen; OAE v The QueenHCA 16
1988Ahern v RHCA 39
and 3 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works