R v Kinghorn (No 2) [2019] NSWSC 989 — Criminal Procedure & Adjournment — Barrister AI
← Back
R v Kinghorn (No 2)
[2019] NSWSC 989
Supreme Court of NSW
Good law / bad law (Silk subscription)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+3 more
Criminal Procedure
adjournment
legality of disclosures of compulsory examinations of accused a central issue
Crown conceded that it had identified incorrect sources of power in earlier correspondence
Case Details
Citation
[2019] NSWSC 989
Court
NSWSC
Jurisdiction
New South Wales
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2019] NSWSC 989
12 authorities it relies on
1990
1996
2002
2008
2014
2019
Relies on
12
2019
R v Kinghorn
NSWSC 553
2018
Tony Strickland (a pseudonym) v Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions; Donald Galloway (a pseudonym) v Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions; Edmund Hodges (a pseudonym) v Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions; Rick Tu
HCA 53
2015
R v Seller; R v McCarthy
NSWCCA 76
2014
X7 v R
NSWCCA 273
and 8 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
