Gare v Firth

[2019] NTSC 24

Supreme Court of the Northern Territory

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Appeal - Local Court appeal against head sentence imposed - non-parole period in excess of statutory minimum -Whether discretion miscarried in fixing of the non-parole period - held non-parole period fixed manifestly excessive - Appeal allowed in part - Order fixing non-parole period set aside.
1. Bara v The Queen [2016] NTCCA 5; Bugmy v The Queen [1990] HCA 18; 169 CLR 525; Emitja v The Queen [2016] NTCCA 4; Flynn v Apuatimi [2019] NTSC 1; House v The King [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499; JF v The Queen [2017] NTCCA 1; Johnson v The Queen [2012] NTCCA 14; Power v The Queen [1974] HCA 26; 131 CLR 623; R v Shrestha [1991] HCA 26; 173 CLR 48, referred to
1. Criminal Code s 213,
1. Sentencing Act, s 40 (1), s 40 (4), s 103

Citation[2019] NTSC 24

CourtNTSC

JurisdictionNorthern Territory

The full text is available to signed-in members.

Already have an account? Sign in