The Queen v Ferguson

[2019] NTSC 81

Supreme Court of the Northern Territory

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Evidence
2. › Coincidence evidence
3. › Criminal proceedings
4. › whether the evidence has significant probative value to be admitted under s 98 of the Evidence (National Uniform Legislation) Act (NT)
5. › evidence of prior incident not admissible.
1. Evidence
2. › Tendency evidence
3. › Criminal proceedings
4. › whether the evidence has significant probative value to be admitted under s 97 of the Evidence (National Uniform Legislation) Act (NT)
5. › evidence of prior incident not admissible.
1. Evidence (National Uniform Legislation) Act 2011 (NT) ss 97, 98, 101
1. HML v The Queen [2008] HCA 16; 235 CLR 334; Hughes v The Queen [2017] HCA 20; 264 A Crim R 225; Hoch v The Queen [1988] HCA 50; 165 CLR 292; IMM v The Queen [2016] HCA 14; 257 CLR 300; Martin v Osborne [1936] HCA 23; 55 CLR 367; McPhillamy v The Queen [2018] HCA 52; 92 ALJR 1045; MWL v The Queen [2016] NTCCA 6; R v Bauer [2018] HCA 40; 92 ALJR 846, referred to.