Cases LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

The Queen v Marawar [2019] NTSC 84 — Admissibility And Relevance — Barrister AI

The Queen v Marawar

[2019] NTSC 84

Supreme Court of the Northern Territory

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Evidence
2. › Admissibility and relevance
3. › Tendency
4. › Whether evidence tends to establish that the accused had a tendency to act in the way asserted
5. › Whether tendency makes the fact in issue more likely
6. › Where alleged fact in issue is fact relied upon as raising self-defence
7. › Alleged fact in issue potentially not in issue
8. › Alleged fact in issue not within tendency
9. › Alleged fact in issue insufficient to raise self-defence
10. › Evidence inadmissible at this point in proceedings
1. Evidence (National Uniform Legislation) Act 2011 (NT) s 97
1. Hughes v The Queen [2017] HCA 20; (2017) 263 CLR 338; applied
1. Director of Public Prosecutions v Campbell (No 1) [2013] VSC 665;

Case Details

Citation[2019] NTSC 84

CourtNTSC

JurisdictionNorthern Territory

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members.

Relies on3

2017Hughes v The QueenHCA 20
2017R v Smiler (No 2)NTSC 31
2013DPP v Campbell & Ors (Ruling No 1)VSC 665

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works