A trial judge's failure to direct the jury on an alternative verdict of grievous bodily harm without intent, where intent is genuinely in issue, constitutes a miscarriage of justice even where no objection was taken by defence counsel, provided the conviction on the more serious charge was not inevitable. The complexity of a summing up involving multiple defences does not excuse the omission of a direction on an alternative verdict that the judge had indicated would be given.
The full text is available to signed-in members.