Schmidt-Teuteberg v Oxfam Australia Pty Ltd & Oxfam Australia Trading Pty Ltd [2019] SAET 178 — Claim For Underpaid Redundancy & Two Similar But — Barrister AI
← Back
Schmidt-Teuteberg v Oxfam Australia Pty Ltd & Oxfam Australia Trading Pty Ltd
[2019] SAET 178
South Australian Employment Tribunal
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+3 more
Claim for underpaid redundancy
different entitlements depending on which employer
›
two similar but
different entities
applicant claims entitlements applicable to employing
Case Details
Citation
[2019] SAET 178
Court
SAET
Jurisdiction
South Australia
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works