Sklifoff, Perry & Cumming v Department of Human Services [2019] SAET 223 — Claims For Penalty Rate After Five & Were Subject To — Barrister AI
← Back
Sklifoff, Perry & Cumming v Department of Human Services
[2019] SAET 223
South Australian Employment Tribunal
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+13 more
Claims for penalty rate after five
hours of continuous work without a meal break or crib break - Whether applicants
were subject to
a working arrangement that provided for a crib break
Case Details
Citation
[2019] SAET 223
Court
SAET
Jurisdiction
South Australia
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2019] SAET 223
4 authorities it relies on
1987
1993
1999
2005
2011
2019
Relies on
4
2018
Qube Ports Pty Ltd v Maritime Union of Australia
FCAFC 72
1999
Calman v Commissioner of Police
HCA 60
and 2 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
