Bukuru v Return to Work Corporation of South Australia [2019] SAET 243 — The Compensating & Authority Did Not Include — Barrister AI
← Back
Bukuru v Return to Work Corporation of South Australia
[2019] SAET 243
South Australian Employment Tribunal
Good law / bad law (paid plan)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+12 more
future economic loss under s 56 of the RTW Act
›
The compensating
authority did not include
in the hours worked factor (HWF) in s 56(4) of the RTW
Act, hours spent by the applicant whilst performing sleepover shifts
Case Details
Citation
[2019] SAET 243
Court
SAET
Jurisdiction
South Australia
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2019] SAET 243
3 authorities it relies on
1946
1961
1976
1991
2006
2019
Relies on
3
2002
Warramunda Village Inc v Pryde
FCA 250
1946
Automatic Fire Sprinklers Pty Ltd v Watson
HCA 25
and 1 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
