Barnes v Omant [2019] TASSC 38 — Appeal And Review - Tasmania — Barrister AI
← Back
Barnes v Omant
[2019] TASSC 38
Supreme Court of Tasmania
Good law / bad law (Silk subscription)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+3 more
Magistrates
›
Appeal and review - Tasmania
›
Motion to review
›
Other matters
›
Refusal of application by prosecution to adjourn sine die
›
Intention to proceed on substitute charges
›
Proposed undertaking to not proceed with complaint
›
Prosecution sought adjournment rather than dismissal due to impact on substitute charges
›
Effect of plea of autrefois acquit and incontrovertibility rule
›
No denial of justice to prosecution.
State of Tasmania v Finnegan [2011] TASSC 74, 21 Tas R 116, referred to.
Sali v SPC Ltd [1993] HCA 47; (1993) 116 ALR 625; R v Carroll [2002] HCA 55, 213 CLR 635, considered.
Aust Dig Magistrates [1349]
Case Details
Citation
[2019] TASSC 38
Court
TASSC
Jurisdiction
Tasmania
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2019] TASSC 38
13 authorities it relies on
1936
1953
1970
1987
2004
2019
Relies on
13
2011
Tasmania v Finnegan
TASSC 74
2006
R v V N
VSCA 111
2006
Hamilton v Littlejohn
TASSC 109
2002
R v Carroll
HCA 55
and 9 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works