Russell v Aitken Partners Pty Ltd [2019] VCC 1164 — “penumbral” Duty & Importance Of Avoiding Hindsight — Barrister AI
← Back
Russell v Aitken Partners Pty Ltd
[2019] VCC 1164
County Court of Victoria
Good law / bad law (Silk subscription)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+1 more
Claim against solicitors for breach of retainer and duty
alleged failure to advise on alterative causes of action
“penumbral” duty
importance of avoiding hindsight
Case Details
Citation
[2019] VCC 1164
Court
VCC
Jurisdiction
Victoria
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2019] VCC 1164
11 authorities it relies on
1981
1989
1997
2005
2013
2019
Relies on
11
2016
Badenach v Calvert
HCA 18
2012
Goddard Elliott (a firm) v Fritsch
VSC 87
2012
Matthews v SPI Electricity and SPI Electricity
VSC 70
2011
Namberry Craft v Watson
VSC 136
and 7 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
