Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Palmer v Citic Ltd [No 2] [2019] WASC 14 — Practice And Procedure — Barrister AI

Palmer v Citic Ltd [No 2]

[2019] WASC 14

Supreme Court of Western Australia

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Practice and procedure
1. Preliminary questions sought but opposed
1. Demurrer hypothesis proposed
1. Underlying facts not agreed

Case Details

Citation[2019] WASC 14

CourtWASC

JurisdictionWestern Australia

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 16 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by16

2025Jones v Waterdale Enterprises Pty Ltd [No 2]WASC 71
2024Sino Iron Pty Ltd v Mineralogy Pty LtdWASC 242
2024Palmer v Citic Ltd [No 11]WASC 210
2023Ventia Utility Services Pty Ltd (Acn 010 725 247) (Formerly Known as Thiess Services Limited) v Electricity Networks Corporation T/as Western PowerWASC 381
and 12 more after sign-in

Relies on14

2017Mineralogy Pty Ltd v Sino Iron Pty LtdWASC 340
2015Mount Bruce Mining Pty Limited v Wright Prospecting Pty LimitedHCA 37
2014Zepinic v Chateau Constructions (Aust) Ltd (No 3)NSWCA 366
2014Ekes v Commonwealth Bank of AustraliaNSWCA 336
and 10 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works