Brown v ACT (No 2) [2020] ACTSC 109 — Costs & Defendants’ Costs — Barrister AI
← Back
Brown v ACT (No 2)
[2020] ACTSC 109
Supreme Court of the ACT
4 May 2020
Good law / bad law (Silk subscription)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
Procedure
›
COSTS
›
Whether plaintiff to pay
defendants’ costs
›
Whether there are sufficient public interest
reasons
to depart from usual costs order
Case Details
Citation
[2020] ACTSC 109
Court
ACTSC
Jurisdiction
Australian Capital Territory
Decision Date
4 May 2020
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2020] ACTSC 109
4 authorities it relies on
1989
1995
2001
2007
2013
2020
Relies on
4
2016
Strano v Australian Capital Territory (No 2)
ACTSC 206
2007
The Wilderness Society Inc. v The Hon. Malcolm Turnbull, Minister for the Environment and Water Resources
FCA 1863
1998
Oshlack v Richmond River Council
HCA 11
1989
Thompson v R
HCA 30
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
