Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

ZL v Corey [2020] ACTSC 143 — Appeal & Appeal Against Sentence — Barrister AI

ZL v Corey

[2020] ACTSC 143

Supreme Court of the ACT3 June 2020

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Appeal and New Trial
2. › APPEAL
3. › Appeal from Magistrates
1. Court
2. › appeal against sentence
3. › whether sentence manifestly
1. excessive
1. whether further evidence should be admitted
2. › whether

Case Details

Citation[2020] ACTSC 143

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date3 June 2020

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 6 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by6

2025DPP v Cahill (a pseudonym)ACTSC 464
2024Norman v JonesACTSC 11
2022R v Kayin (a pseudonym)ACTSC 164
2021Dang v LiACTSC 179
and 2 more after sign-in

Relies on44

2018Purcell v O'ReillyACTSC 60
2017Director of Public Prosecutions v Dalgliesh (a pseudonym)HCA 41
2017R v Toumo'uaACTCA 9
2016The Queen v KilicHCA 48
and 40 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works