Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Polleycutt v Taylor [2020] ACTSC 158 — Practice & Procedure & Costs — Barrister AI

Polleycutt v Taylor

[2020] ACTSC 158

Supreme Court of the ACT18 June 2020

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Practice & Procedure
1. Costs
1. re-exercise of costs discretion on appeal
1. fixed sum costs order appropriate

Case Details

Citation[2020] ACTSC 158

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date18 June 2020

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 5 later cases that cite this judgment.

1 of the 5 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.

Cited by5

2024Giles (a pseudonym) v Stamp (a pseudonym)ACTSC 150
2023Jorgensen v The Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory (No 3)ACTSC 396
2023Jorgensen v Wilson (No 3)ACTSC 124
2022Pesec v Consolidated Builders Ltd (No 7)ACTSC 244
and 1 more after sign-in

Relies on14

2019Polleycutt v AldcroftACTSC 174
2017The Owners of Unit Plan 932 v De Andrade (nee Marhaba) (No 3)ACTSC 410
2014Andara Homes Pty Limited v Palm and JiangACTSC 141
2008Boyapati v Rockefeller Management Corporation (No 2)FCA 1375
and 10 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works