The case applies standard sentencing principles for commercial quantity drug importation in a joint enterprise context, with the offender receiving 5 years and 9 months for importation of 2.2 kg pure MDMA and 9 months for trafficking 1.19 kg dibutylone. The court assessed the offender's role as broadly equivalent to but slightly below the directing co-offender who was in custody. A 15% discount was applied for a late guilty plea to the importation charge and 25% for the earlier trafficking plea. ADHD diagnosis was accepted as relevant to subjective background and rehabilitation but not as reducing moral culpability. COVID-19 hardship in custody was accepted as a relevant sentencing factor.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 3 later cases that cite this judgment.