Ezekiel-Hart v Ikoro (No 2) [2020] ACTSC 31 — Costs & Costs Under R 1720(3)(c) Of The Court — Barrister AI
← Back
Ezekiel-Hart v Ikoro (No 2)
[2020] ACTSC 31
Supreme Court of the ACT
21 February 2020
Good law / bad law (Silk subscription)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
Procedure
›
COSTS
›
Whether applicant to pay
respondents’ costs
›
Costs under r 1720(3)(c) of the Court
Procedures Rules 2006 (ACT)
Case Details
Citation
[2020] ACTSC 31
Court
ACTSC
Jurisdiction
Australian Capital Territory
Decision Date
21 February 2020
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2020] ACTSC 31
3 authorities it relies on
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Relies on
3
2020
Ezekiel-Hart v Ikoro
ACTSC 6
2017
The Owners of Unit Plan 932 v De Andrade (nee Marhaba) (No 3)
ACTSC 410
2014
Andara Homes Pty Limited v Palm and Jiang
ACTSC 141
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
