Cases LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

R v Sagnelli [2020] ACTSC 348 — Criminal & Jurisdiction, Practice — Barrister AI

R v Sagnelli

[2020] ACTSC 348

Supreme Court of the ACT

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal
1. Law
2. › JURISDICTION, PRACTICE
1. a marketable quantity
1. of MDMA
2. › importing a marketable quantity of LSD

Case Details

Citation[2020] ACTSC 348

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.

Cited by1

2022R v Pickering-WilsonACTSC 353

Relies on4

2020Woods v RNSWCCA 219
2015R v NeACTSC 352
2015Ludwig v The QueenVSCA 35
2008Adams v The QueenHCA 15

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works