Cases LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

R v Crawford (No 3) [2020] ACTSC 369 — Criminal & Jurisdiction, Practice — Barrister AI

R v Crawford (No 3)

[2020] ACTSC 369

Supreme Court of the ACT23 October 2020

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal
1. Law
2. › JURISDICTION, PRACTICE
1. drug and alcohol treatment
1. order
2. › unsatisfactory circumstances

Case Details

Citation[2020] ACTSC 369

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date23 October 2020

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 15 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by15

2023R v Rogers (No 2)ACTSC 5
2022R v Bonfield (No 2); R v McColl (No 2); R v Williams (No 3)ACTSC 377
2022R v Peric (No 2); R v Williams (No 2)ACTSC 277
2022R v Fry (No 2)ACTSC 389
and 11 more after sign-in

Relies on19

2020R v Crawford (No 2)ACTSC 367
2020R v Crawford (No 1)ACTSC 245
2019Anderson v BYF19FCA 1959
2015R v Scerba (No 2)ACTSC 359
and 15 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works