Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

R v Gray [2020] ACTSC 40 — Jurisdiction, Practice And Procedure & Sentence — Barrister AI

R v Gray

[2020] ACTSC 40

Supreme Court of the ACT7 February 2020

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Law
2. › JURISDICTION, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
1. Judgment and Punishment
2. › Sentence
3. › going equipped for theft
1. failing to report a change of details as a registrable offender
1. trespass
2. › drug and alcohol treatment order

Case Details

Citation[2020] ACTSC 40

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date7 February 2020

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 4 later cases that cite this judgment.

1 of the 4 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.

Cited by4

2023R v Hancock (No 4)ACTSC 254
2022R v Campbell (No 2)ACTSC 370
2022R v WintersACTSC 371
and 1 more after sign-in

Relies on5

2020R v ParkerACTSC 38
2019R v DegioannisACTSC 47
2013Agius v The QueenHCA 27
2012Weston v ArleyACTSC 138
and 1 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works