A claim of indirect disability discrimination under s 6 of the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) is not reasonably arguable where the alleged services and requirements are referrable solely to the individual applicant, with no allegation that the requirements were or would have been imposed on other recipients of relevant services, as this precludes any finding of differential treatment between the applicant and others.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 17 later cases that cite this judgment.