Constitutional arguments that mandatory visa cancellation under s 501(3A) of the Migration Act abrogates a non-citizen's parole rights or impairs the institutional integrity of State courts are without merit, because a non-parole period confers only eligibility to apply for parole rather than a right to release, and the question of parole is outside the scope of judicial power.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 4 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 4 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.