A Tribunal applying Direction No 79 in a s 501CA(4) revocation decision is entitled to form its own adverse view of the nature and seriousness of offending conduct and to assess the risk of reoffending at a level higher than that assessed by expert psychologists, provided the assessment is intelligibly justified and within the bounds of rationality and logic.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 13 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 13 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.