Practitioners acting for adult child applicants in family provision claims should note that the financial resources and willingness of the applicant's own children to provide support are relevant considerations under s 60(2) and that the evaluative discretion is broad and fact-specific, not amenable to a rigid needs-based approach.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 18 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 18 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.