Carr v Council of the Law Society of New South Wales

[2020] NSWCA 276

NSW Court of Appeal

View on CaseLaw

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Professions and Trades
2. › Lawyers
3. › Complaints and discipline
4. › Misappropriation of trust monies
5. › Requirements for dishonesty
6. › Whether overdraft in office account constitutes misappropriation
7. › Whether knowledge of dissipation of trust funds required
8. › Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW), s 243
1. Professions and Trades
2. › Lawyers
3. › Complaints and discipline
4. › Attempts to mislead
5. › Requisite element of intention
6. › Whether finding that solicitor ought to have known statement was misleading sufficient to establish attempt to mislead
1. Professions and Trades
2. › Lawyers
3. › Complaints and discipline
4. › Unconditional undertakings
5. › Whether undertaking breached where performance would be unlawful
6. › Whether solicitor's letter constituted unconditional undertaking
7. › Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW), s 255(1)(b)
1. Evidence
2. › Hearsay
3. › Limited admissibility
4. › Cross-examination on document admitted for limited purpose
5. › Whether cross-examination on file note admitted only to establish jurisdiction permissible
6. › Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), ss 44, 59

Quick Take

Practitioners and disciplinary bodies should note that charges of attempting to mislead require proof of deliberate intention, not mere negligence or constructive knowledge, and that undertakings to transfer trust money are qualified by statutory requirements for client authorisation under s 255(1)(b) of the Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW).