Sayed v National Australia Bank

[2020] NSWCA 88

NSW Court of Appeal

View on CaseLaw

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Practice and Procedure
2. › Court of Appeal
3. › Parties
4. › Removal of party
5. › Whether party to agreement subject of specific performance order is necessary party to appeal proceedings
6. › Whether party should be removed
1. Practice and Procedure
2. › Court of Appeal
3. › Notices to produce
4. › Setting aside notice to produce
5. › Whether documents sought had any utility
6. › Whether litigant in person should be restrained from issuing further notices to produce without leave

Quick Take

This is a routine procedural decision with minimal precedential value; it illustrates that a party to an agreement subject to specific performance proceedings is a necessary party to any appeal, and that notices to produce will be set aside where they lack utility.

Case Details

Citation[2020] NSWCA 88

CourtNSWCA

JurisdictionNew South Wales

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members.

Relies on1

2019National Australia Bank Limited v SayedNSWSC 653

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in