CONTRACTS — building and construction — plaintiff supplied carpentry and joinery services to customer at three separate commercial premises — dispute about payment terms — whether customer liable to pay more than estimated costs previously agreed to — whether agreement to final payment terms can be inferred — whether construction works were defective — whether rectification works necessary or reasonable to be undertaken — relevance of any lack of intention to carry out rectification works
EVIDENCE — business records admitted — no testimonial evidence to support inferences said to be drawn from records — approach to considering weight to be given to records
