CRC Gosford Pty Ltd & Anor v Columbus Investment Services Ltd as Trustee for the Gosford Ownership Trust and the Gosford Landholding Trust & Anor [2020] NSWSC 1153 — Onus Of Proof & Trusts And Trustees — Barrister AI
CRC Gosford Pty Ltd & Anor v Columbus Investment Services Ltd as Trustee for the Gosford Ownership Trust and the Gosford Landholding Trust & Anor
EVIDENCE - burden of proof, presumptions, and weight and sufficiency of evidence
› onus of proof
› failure of SIF to call any witnesses concerning its claim that CIS paid excess amounts to CRC and loaned money to CRC
› implications of failure to call witnesses
› HELD: SIF bore the onus of proof which it has failed to discharge and further the implication was that evidence of such witnesses could give would not have assisted SIF’s case.
Equity
› Trusts and trustees
› Trust instruments
› Construction of cl 7 of the GLT Indemnity - whether the clause excluded the subrogation claim or whether it is ambiguous and should be read down
› HELD: cl 7, of and by itself, excluded a claim for subrogation by GLT and was not ambiguous and should not be read down.
Case Details
Citation[2020] NSWSC 1153
CourtNSWSC
JurisdictionNew South Wales
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.