The Queen v Casimiro & The Queen v Pinto

[2020] NTSC 18

Supreme Court of the Northern Territory

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Evidence
2. › Police Administration Act s 120C
3. › Whether search authorised
4. › Whether reasonable grounds to suspect the accused had a dangerous drug in his possession
5. › Search authorised
1. Evidence
2. › Evidence (National Uniform Legislation) Act s 138
3. › Whether evidence obtained on search of accused improperly obtained
4. › Evidence not improperly obtained
1. Evidence
2. › Whether police body worn camera footage admissible to prove lies told in consciousness of guilt
3. › Evidence admissible
1. EVIDENCE - Evidence (National Uniform Legislation) Act s 90
2. › Admissions made by accused to police delivering caution in accordance with Police Administration Act s 140
3. › Accused had been administered oxycodone for pain relief
4. › Whether unfair to accused to admit evidence of admissions
5. › No unfairness