Cases LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Parry v Firth [2020] NTSC 37 — Appeal & Criminal Code (NT) S 210(1), S 210(2) — Barrister AI

Parry v Firth

[2020] NTSC 37

Supreme Court of the Northern Territory

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Law
2. › APPEAL
3. › SENTENCE
4. › PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS
5. › whether the sentencing Judge erred in failing to indicate that was contemplating a term of imprisonment
6. › where the prosecution had not sought a term of imprisonment
7. › where the sentencing Judge indicated he was contemplating more than a fine
8. › where the sentencing Judge sought further submissions
9. › No breach of procedural fairness.
1. Criminal Law
2. › APPEAL
3. › SENTENCE
4. › whether the sentencing Judge erred in failing to consider and exclude alternatives to imprisonment
5. › where the sentencing Judge failed to provide adequate reasons for excluding these alternatives as viable sentencing dispositions
6. › Where the sentencing disposition was not a proportionate sentencing disposition given the age and circumstances of the appellant
7. › Appeal allowed.
1. Criminal Law
2. › APPEAL
3. › SENTENCE
4. › Whether sentence was manifestly excessive
5. › where lower range form of theft committed by a youthful offender
6. › where offender had no prior criminal history
7. › Appeal allowed.
1. Criminal Code (NT) s 210(1), s 210(2)

Case Details

Citation[2020] NTSC 37

CourtNTSC

JurisdictionNorthern Territory

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members.

Relies on20

2019Flynn v ApuatimiNTSC 1
2016The Queen v KilicHCA 48
2016Garling v FirthNTSC 41
2013Owens v YoungNTSC 49
and 16 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works