The Queen v Faustmann

[2020] NTSC 8

Supreme Court of the Northern Territory

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

1. Evidence
2. › Admissibility and relevance
3. › Evidence (National Uniform Legislation) Act 2011 (NT) s 97 and s 101 - Tendency evidence
4. › Whether tendency evidence has significant probative value
5. › whether probative value of the evidence substantially outweighs any potential prejudicial effect on the accused - Evidence admissible
1. Evidence (National Uniform Legislation) Act 2011 (NT) s 97, s 101
1. HML v The Queen; SB v The Queen; OAE v The Queen [2008] HCA 16; (2008) 235 CLR 334; Hughes v The Queen [2017] HCA 20; IMM v The Queen (2016) 257 CLR 300; McPhillamy v The Queen [2018] HCA 52; (2018) 361 ALR 13; R v Bauer [2018] HCA 40; (2018) 92 ALJR 846; R v Lisoff [1999] NSWCCA 364; The Queen v AW [2018] NTSC 29, applied