The case confirms that a jury is entitled to accept a complainant's evidence in sexual offence cases notwithstanding minor inconsistencies, where the complainant made immediate and consistent complaints and was visibly distressed. An appellant's lies to police, followed by a changed account at trial claiming consent, are properly considered by the jury as going to both credibility and consciousness of guilt.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.
1 of the 2 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.