Where a person seeks appointment as litigation guardian in place of an existing litigation guardian, the correct question under r 95(2) UCPR is whether the interests of the person under incapacity require the removal of the existing guardian, not whether the proposed replacement is qualified. A person who is themselves a claimant against the same estate has an interest adverse to the person under incapacity for the purposes of r 94 UCPR, even where they profess an intention to seek equal provision.
The full text is available to signed-in members.