Where leave to appeal is required and has not been granted, security for costs may be ordered under r 670(1) UCPR rather than r 772. The court will assess prospects of success, impecuniosity, delay, and mootness as discretionary factors. An applicant's prior success in crowdfunding security does not preclude a finding that further security would stifle the appeal. The distinction between jurisdiction to issue enforcement process and power to serve it interstate should not be confused in challenges to enforcement hearing summonses directed at interstate judgment debtors.
The full text is available to signed-in members.