Factual findings on appeal under s 118(3) of the District Court of Queensland Act 1967 may only be reviewed where there is an 'overwhelming preponderance' of evidence against them, making them 'unreasonable, and almost perverse'. Mere disagreement with credibility findings does not articulate a basis for appellate interference.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.
2 of the 2 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.