Practitioners in South Australian criminal law should note this case as a useful illustration of the admissibility of prior drug trafficking convictions as discreditable conduct evidence under s 34P, particularly where the evidence is said to establish a continuing interest and involvement in drug trading.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 4 later cases that cite this judgment.
3 of the 4 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.