Cases LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Bigg v King [2020] TASSC 41 — Aust Dig Equity [1440] — Barrister AI

Bigg v King

[2020] TASSC 41

Supreme Court of Tasmania

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Supreme Court Civil Procedure Act 1932 (Tas), s 6(5), (6).
1. Supreme Court Rules 2000 (Tas), rr 90(f), (i), 604.
1. Macedonian Orthodox Community Church St Petka Inc v His Eminence Petar The Diocesan Bishop of The Macedonian Orthodox Diocese of Australia and New Zealand [2008] HCA 42, 237 CLR 66, applied.
1. Re Johnson v Reed (1909) 5 TLR 92; Dobson v The Salvation Army Supreme Court of Tasmania 15/1983, referred to.

Case Details

Citation[2020] TASSC 41

CourtTASSC

JurisdictionTasmania

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 1 later case that cites this judgment.

Cited by1

2022King v Bigg (No 2)TASSC 7

Relies on6

2014Application of Uncle's Joint Pty Ltd ACN 148 176 792 & AnorNSWSC 321
2012Plan B Trustees Ltd v Maitland ParkerWASC 392
2008Macedonian Orthodox Community Church St Petka Incorporated v His Eminence Petar The Diocesan Bishop of The Macedonian Orthodox Diocese of Australia and New ZealandHCA 42
1998Hodges, Andrew Philip, ReTASSC 96
and 2 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works