Tasmania v AB and CD [2020] TASSC 49 — General Matters — Barrister AI
← Back
Tasmania v AB and CD
[2020] TASSC 49
Supreme Court of Tasmania
Good law / bad law (Silk subscription)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
+3 more
Criminal Law
›
General matters
›
Ancillary liability
›
Conspiracy
›
Evidence
›
Co-conspirator's rule
›
Preconditions for admissibility of hearsay representations of a co-conspirator
›
Whether rule is applicable in a case where the evidence is admitted to prove the existence of a conspiracy.
Criminal Code (Tas), ss 158, 297, 326.
Evidence Act 2001 (Tas), ss 18, 66.
KRM v The Queen [2011] HCA 11, 206 CLR 221; Georgiadis v The Queen [2002] TASSC 58, 11 Tas R 137, considered.
Case Details
Citation
[2020] TASSC 49
Court
TASSC
Jurisdiction
Tasmania
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2020] TASSC 49
6 authorities it relies on
1981
1989
1997
2005
2013
2020
Relies on
6
2007
Tasmania v Green, Nicholson and White
TASSC 54
2003
Court of Criminal Appeal Citation : Fonseka v The Queen
WASCA 111
2002
Georgiadis & Ors v R
TASSC 58
2001
KRM v R
HCA 11
and 2 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works