Cases LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

Jorgensen v ASIC [2020] TASSC 56 — Practice And Procedure — Barrister AI

Jorgensen v ASIC

[2020] TASSC 56

Supreme Court of Tasmania

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Appeal and New Trial
2. › Practice and procedure
3. › Tasmania
4. › When appeal lies
5. › Other matters
6. › Originating and interlocutory applications determined by associate judge
7. › No jurisdiction for single judge to hear appeal from final judgment
8. › Whether notice of appeal adequate and could be treated as an appeal to the Full Court.
1. Supreme Court Civil Procedure Act 1932 (Tas), ss 40(1), 191B.
1. Supreme Court Rules 2000 (Tas), rr 657, 659, 660, 680A.
1. Gerlach v Clifton Bricks Pty Limited [2002] HCA 22, 209 CLR 478, considered.

Case Details

Citation[2020] TASSC 56

CourtTASSC

JurisdictionTasmania

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.

1 of the 2 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.

Cited by2

2026Walker v Clarence City CouncilTASSC 23
2022Jorgensen v ASICTASSC 40

Relies on5

2019Jorgensen v Australian Securities and Investment CommissionTASSC 46
2007Commissioner of Police v Chidgey and AnorNSWSC 417
2002Gerlach v Clifton Bricks Pty LtdHCA 22
1990Banque Commerciale SA v Akhil Holdings LtdHCA 11
and 1 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works