A complainant's admitted history of lying to medical professionals, drug abuse, mental health issues, delay in complaint, and continued attendance at family functions does not, individually or cumulatively, necessarily render guilty verdicts unreasonable in sexual offence cases where the jury had the advantage of seeing and hearing the witnesses. Good character evidence, even from multiple witnesses, may be accorded only modest weight where the offending is alleged to have occurred in private. It is not necessary to identify an 'inherent flaw' in an accused's evidence before it may be rejected by a jury.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 4 later cases that cite this judgment.
2 of the 4 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.