The different character of subsequent offending compared to the offending for which a suspended imprisonment order was made does not, of itself, mandate a conclusion that it would be unjust to require service of the suspended sentence under s 80(3) of the Sentencing Act 1995 (WA), particularly where the subsequent offending is more serious and the offender was to serve substantial terms of immediate imprisonment in any event.
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 12 later cases that cite this judgment.
2 of the 12 citing cases carry a classified treatment. How each court treated it is available to signed-in members.