Cases LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

EBA v Cth [2021] ACTSC 186 — Practice And Procedure & Cross-vesting Legislation — Barrister AI

EBA v Cth

[2021] ACTSC 186

Supreme Court of the ACT18 August 2021

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Practice and Procedure
1. Cross-vesting Legislation
1. Application to transfer proceeding to the Federal Court of Australia in accordance with the Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-vesting) Act 1993 (ACT)

Case Details

Citation[2021] ACTSC 186

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date18 August 2021

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by2

2022Zhang v Trinity Law Pty LtdACTSC 264
2021Yates v The State of New South WalesACTSC 193

Relies on12

2020Minister for Home Affairs v DMA18 as litigation guardian for DLZ18; Minister for Home Affairs v Marie Theresa Arthur as litigation representative for BXD18, Minister for Home Affairs v FRX17 as litigation representative for FRM17; Minister for Home Affairs v DJA18 as litigation representative for DIZ18HCA 43
2020Stone v EbeidFCA 343
2018CPB Contractors Pty Limited v Celsus Pty Limited (formerly known as SA Health Partnership Nominees Pty Ltd) (No 2)FCA 2112
2013Bateman and Idameneo (No 123) Pty Limited v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited and OrsACTSC 72
and 8 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works