R v Ceissman (No 3) [2021] ACTSC 191 — Strike Out — Barrister AI
← Back
R v Ceissman (No 3)
[2021] ACTSC 191
Supreme Court of the ACT
27 July 2022
Good law / bad law (Silk subscription)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
Practice and Procedure
›
strike out
›
whether proceedings barred by s 16B of the Limitation Act 1985 (ACT)
›
whether plaintiff failed to comply with s 51 of the Civil Law (Wrongs) Act 2002 (ACT)
›
whether damages allegation properly pleaded
Case Details
Citation
[2021] ACTSC 191
Court
ACTSC
Jurisdiction
Australian Capital Territory
Decision Date
27 July 2022
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2021] ACTSC 191
41 authorities it relies on
1949
1963
1977
1991
2005
2021
Relies on
41
2020
Clayton v Bant
HCA 44
2020
Findex Group Limited v McKay
FCAFC 182
2020
ALDI Foods Pty Limited as General Partner of ALDI Stores (a Ltd Partnership) v Transport Workers' Union of Australia
FCA 269
2019
Findex Group Limited v McKay
FCA 2129
and 37 more after sign-in
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
