› whether fourth defendant was a knowing participant in first defendant’s breach of fiduciary duty
› whether fourth defendant liable to account to plaintiff
› liability of the fourth defendant established
› director of the fourth defendant had knowledge of and cooperated in scheme to take benefit of the plaintiff’s business
› account of profits ordered
› fourth defendant to disgorge profits over two year period
Contracts
› CONTRACT OF EMPLOYMENT
› Breach of contracts
› breach of obligation to act with honesty, care and skill established against first, second and third defendants
› breach of obligations in relation to confidential information and intellectual property established against first, second and third defendants
› breach of restraint of trade clause established against first defendant
› restraint clause not enforceable against second and third defendants
Corporations
› STATUTORY DUTIES
› Duties of employees and directors
› where employees and former director were alleged to have breached duties owed to the plaintiff under ss 180, 181, 182 and 183 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
› breaches established against the first, second, third and fifth defendants
Case Details
Citation[2021] ACTSC 199
CourtACTSC
JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory
Decision Date30 August 2021
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 5 later cases that cite this judgment.
