Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

R v Watt [2021] ACTSC 20 — Jurisdiction, Practice And Procedure — Barrister AI

R v Watt

[2021] ACTSC 20

Supreme Court of the ACT

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Law
2. › JURISDICTION, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
3. › Judgment and punishment
4. › sentence
5. › giving false or misleading information as an officer of a corporation
6. › mid range example of offence
7. › offending occurred over a substantial period of time
8. › gross breach of offender’s obligations to the corporation
9. › medium to low risk of reoffending
10. › automatic disqualification from managing corporations
11. › sentence of imprisonment and recognizance release order imposed
1. Criminal Law
2. › JURISDICTION, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
3. › Judgment and punishment
4. › application for a reparation order in favour of a corporation
5. › satisfied beyond reasonable double that the corporation suffered a loss as a result of the offending
6. › difficulty in quantifying the extent of the loss
7. › therefore inappropriate to make a reparation order

Case Details

Citation[2021] ACTSC 20

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 2 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by2

2021R v AlbertsACTSC 341
2021R v RoussakisACTSC 19

Relies on12

2021R v RoussakisACTSC 19
2020Higgins v Australian Capital TerritoryACTSC 19
2018R v FalconerNSWSC 1765
2016R v Ca (No 2)ACTSC 371
and 8 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works