R v Incandela [2021] ACTSC 222 — Jurisdiction, Practice And Procedure — Barrister AI
← Back
R v Incandela
[2021] ACTSC 222
Supreme Court of the ACT
30 July 2021
Good law / bad law (Silk subscription)
Add to Notebook
0 highlights
0 notes
Copy Citation
More
Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.
See how it works
Interrogate
Catchwords
Criminal Law
›
JURISDICTION, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
›
pre-trial application
›
application to appoint intermediary for complainant
›
whether complainant has a “communication difficulty”
›
application for a ground rules hearing to be held for complainant
Evidence
›
TAKING OF EVIDENCE
›
pre-trial application
›
application for complainant to give evidence at pre-trial hearing
›
witness in a relevant proceeding
›
sexual offence proceeding
›
adult complainant
›
whether complainant is a “vulnerable adult”
Case Details
Citation
[2021] ACTSC 222
Court
ACTSC
Jurisdiction
Australian Capital Territory
Decision Date
30 July 2021
Unlock so much more with Barrister AI
The full text is available to signed-in members.
[2021] ACTSC 222
2 authorities it relies on
1996
2001
2006
2011
2016
2021
Relies on
2
2011
LS v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) and Anor
NSWSC 1016
1996
Taikato v R
HCA 28
Create free account
Already have an account?
Sign in
See how it works
