Cases LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

R v Booth [2021] ACTSC 223 — Jurisdiction, Practice And Procedure — Barrister AI

R v Booth

[2021] ACTSC 223

Supreme Court of the ACT1 September 2021

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Law
2. › JURISDICTION, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
3. › Judgment and punishment
4. › sentence
5. › aggravated burglary
6. › offender found guilty at jury trial
7. › offending did not involve pre-mediation
8. › no entry into the house proper
9. › offender otherwise of good character
10. › good behaviour order with community service work condition imposed
1. Criminal Law
2. › JURISDICTION, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
3. › Judgment and Punishment
4. › related charge
5. › transfer charge of common assault
6. › determination of charge following jury trial
7. › offence proved beyond reasonable doubt
8. › sentence
9. › offending in the mid-range of objective seriousness
10. › good behaviour order imposed

Case Details

Citation[2021] ACTSC 223

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Decision Date1 September 2021

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 4 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by4

2022Booth v The QueenACTCA 46
2021R v Booth (No 3)ACTSC 309
2021R v Booth (No 2)ACTSC 255
2021R v BoothACTSC 224

Relies on2

2007R v SwiftVSCA 52
2001Cheung v RHCA 67

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works