Latest Cases Case Lookup LegislationBeta Notebook Research Briefs

R v Sidaros (No 6) [2021] ACTSC 24 — Jurisdiction, Practice And Procedure — Barrister AI

R v Sidaros (No 6)

[2021] ACTSC 24

Supreme Court of the ACT

More

Built by Barristers,
For Australian Law.

See how it works

Interrogate

Catchwords

1. Criminal Law
2. › JURISDICTION, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
3. › Judgment and punishment
4. › principles of sentencing following a retrial
5. › no material difference in facts found
6. › original sentences not manifestly inadequate or affected by specific error
7. › term of original sentences not exceeded

Case Details

Citation[2021] ACTSC 24

CourtACTSC

JurisdictionAustralian Capital Territory

Unlock so much more with Barrister AI

The full text is available to signed-in members, including the 11 later cases that cite this judgment.

Cited by11

2026DPP v JemberACTSC 271
2025DPP v Eneliko; DPP v Crichton; DPP v Pauga; DPP v Ogden (a pseudonym)ACTSC 306
2024DPP v PayneACTSC 306
2023DPP v Manns (No 2)ACTSC 405
and 7 more after sign-in

Relies on5

2020R v Sidaros (No 4)ACTSC 87
2008Giotas v RNSWCCA 287
2007Tarrant v ReginaNSWCCA 124
2002R v HannesNSWSC 1182
and 1 more after sign-in

Create free account

Already have an account? Sign in

See how it works